IEEPA-related tariffs have been struck down by the Supreme Court. Every business that paid them is now a potential claimant. The firms that qualify leads fast — before competitors do — will win this wave.
The ruling creates immediate work across two practice types — and both require fast, systematic intake to capitalize.
Importers of record who paid IEEPA tariffs directly to U.S. Customs can file for refunds. CBP will process them to the importer — but qualification, timing, and claim preparation matter. Firms with customs and trade experience will be inundated with inquiries from day one.
The harder, longer-tail fight: who in the supply chain actually keeps the refund? Distributors, manufacturers, and retailers who absorbed tariff surcharges may have legitimate claims against importers. This is commercial contract litigation at scale — and it will run for years.
The challenge: Both opportunity types will generate massive inbound volume — from legitimate high-value claims to businesses with weak or non-existent cases. Without a systematic intake and qualification process, your firm wastes time on unwinnable cases and misses the ones worth taking.
High-volume, high-stakes intake where fast qualification is the difference between a great case and a time sink.
An AI-guided conversational intake captures claimants 24/7 — asking the right questions in the right order. Claimant type, tariff amounts, contract documentation, goods category, supply chain role — all collected before your team ever picks up the phone.
Every submitted intake is automatically scored against your firm's criteria — tariff amounts paid, documentation quality, supply chain position, and legal exposure. Your team sees a case score before they open the record.
Track every lead from first inquiry through intake, evaluation, and engagement. Tag leads as Qualified, Needs Documentation, Strong Claim, or Disqualified — whatever maps to your workflow.
Customs brokers, accountants, and trade associations are already fielding questions. Set up referral partner portals so they submit leads directly and track real-time status — without touching your internal dashboard.
Automated intake, instant scoring, and priority queues mean your team focuses on high-value cases — not manually triaging a spreadsheet. The firms that move fastest win the best cases.
Seamlessly push qualified leads into Filevine, Litify (Salesforce), or LeadDocket. No duplicate data entry, no handoff friction — just a clean pipeline from inquiry to engagement.
Waypoint in Action
Waypoint's criteria library is organized by category — case value, liability, medical, urgency, red flags, and more. For IEEPA claims, your library is configured around the specific factors that matter: tariff amounts, supply chain position, documentation quality, and legal exposure.
The moment an intake is submitted, Waypoint evaluates it against every criterion and surfaces a score. No manual review, no gut calls — just consistent, documented evaluation on every single claimant, applied with the same standard every time.
Configure Waypoint criteria around the factors that actually determine whether a claim is worth pursuing. Every intake gets evaluated automatically — consistently, at scale.
According to PwC's analysis, companies should immediately inventory IEEPA duties paid, map PSC and protest deadlines, review contractual tariff pass-through provisions, and coordinate across trade, tax, finance, and legal functions. "Early preparation may be critical" — the firms with a systematic intake process in place before formal CBP guidance issues will be best positioned to act fast on the strongest cases.
Case Compass is already used by firms managing high-volume intake. IEEPA claims are the same challenge at a different scale.
Firms that build a systematic intake process now will capture the most valuable IEEPA cases. Those that don't will be manually triaging inquiries while competitors are closing retainers.